The Building Safety Act 2022 and Fabric Specification: What Interior Designers Need to Know

The Building Safety Act 2022 and Fabric Specification: What Interior Designers Need to Know

What the Act introduced: A Principal Designer role with legal duties to ensure all design work — including material specification — complies with Building Regulations. Operative from 1 October 2023 for all projects requiring building control approval.
Higher-risk buildings: Residential buildings 18 metres or more in height, or seven or more storeys. Additional, more stringent duties apply to all design work on these buildings.
What this means for fabric specification: Any designer specifying materials in a higher-risk building must be able to demonstrate competence in fire safety compliance. Every fabric specification decision that affects fire safety must be documented and retained as part of the building’s safety case.
Who this applies to: Interior designers, architects, and design-and-build contractors involved in any project requiring building control approval in England.

The Building Safety Act 2022 is the most significant change to the regulation of building design and construction in England since the 1980s. It was enacted in response to the Grenfell Tower disaster and introduced a comprehensive new duty-holder framework, new competence requirements, and a new regulatory body — the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) — with powers to scrutinise and approve higher-risk building work. Interior designers and fabric specifiers are affected by the Act in ways that are not always clearly communicated. This guide explains what the Act requires, what it means for fabric specification decisions, and how to document compliance.


What the Building Safety Act 2022 Does

The Act creates a new regulatory regime for all building work requiring building control approval in England, with additional and more stringent requirements for higher-risk buildings. It does three things relevant to interior designers and fabric specifiers.

First, it introduces a mandatory Principal Designer role for any project with more than one contractor, operative from 1 October 2023. The Principal Designer is responsible for planning, managing, monitoring, and coordinating the design work to ensure compliance with Building Regulations — including fire safety. This is a distinct role from the Principal Designer under CDM Regulations 2015, although the same person or organisation may hold both roles if competent to do so.

Second, it places a duty of competence on anyone carrying out design work. Section 35 of the Act defines competence as having the necessary skills, knowledge, experience, and behaviours. A designer who specifies materials — including fabrics and soft furnishings — in a building subject to the Act must be able to demonstrate that their specification decisions comply with the applicable Building Regulations fire safety requirements.

Third, it introduces a golden thread of information — a continuous, maintained record of design decisions relating to fire safety and structural integrity — that must be created during the design phase, updated through construction, and retained for the life of the building. For higher-risk buildings this is a formal legal requirement. For other buildings the principle of maintaining clear documentation of safety-related design decisions is strongly recommended and increasingly expected by the insurance market.


Higher-Risk Buildings: What They Are and Why They Matter

A higher-risk building (HRB) is defined under the Act as a building of at least 18 metres in height or at least seven storeys, containing at least two residential units. Most tall residential apartment buildings in England meet this definition. Many hotel developments, residential care buildings, and mixed-use developments with residential components also qualify.

For HRB projects, the Building Safety Regulator must approve the design before construction begins at Gateway 2. The Principal Designer must submit a detailed compliance statement demonstrating that the design meets Building Regulations requirements. All duty holders — including designers — must operate a mandatory occurrence reporting system and report any safety occurrence to the BSR.

A safety occurrence is defined as any aspect of the design relating to the structural integrity or fire safety of a higher-risk building that, if built, would present a significant risk of death or serious injury. A fabric specification that does not meet the applicable fire standard — or that uses a topical FR treatment that has degraded without replacement — could in principle constitute a safety occurrence in an HRB context. This is not a theoretical risk. It is the kind of documentation failure that the golden thread requirement is specifically designed to prevent.


What This Means for Fabric Specification

For most interior design projects, the Building Safety Act’s practical impact on fabric specification is not a change in the fire standards that apply — Crib 5, BS 7176, BS 5867 were the applicable standards before the Act and remain so — but a change in the documentation and accountability requirements around compliance with those standards.

Before the Act, a designer who specified a Crib 5-certified fabric for a hotel project was meeting the applicable fire standard. After the Act, that same designer must also be able to demonstrate: that they understood the applicable standard and specified correctly against it; that they obtained a valid test certificate from a UKAS-accredited laboratory; that they documented the specification decision and retained the certificate; and, if the project involves an HRB, that the fabric specification was included in the golden thread information provided to the Principal Designer and ultimately to the building owner.

The practical implication is that fabric specification documentation must be more systematic than it often has been. A verbal instruction to the upholsterer or a purchase order without fire certification reference is no longer adequate for projects subject to the Act. The fire test certificate must be obtained before installation, referenced in the specification document, and retained as part of the project file.

For full guidance on obtaining fire test certificates and what they must cover, see our Crib 5 guide, our hotel fabric specification guide, and our FR treatment guide.


The Principal Designer Role and Interior Design Services

The RIBA/BIID professional services contracts — updated in their 2024 amendments — include an expanded schedule of services that now explicitly references the Principal Designer role under Part 2A of the Building Regulations. An interior designer or architect carrying interior design services within their scope on a qualifying project may be asked to act as, or contribute to the duties of, the Principal Designer.

The 2024 amendment to the RIBA/BIID contracts draws specific attention to the requirement for the designer to assess their competency to undertake the Principal Designer role before accepting it. Interior designers whose practice includes projects in higher-risk buildings should assess whether their competence in fire safety, structural safety, and the golden thread documentation requirements meets the standard required by PAS 8671, the publicly available specification setting out the minimum competence requirements for Principal Designers.


The Golden Thread and Fabric Documentation

The golden thread is a digitally maintained record of design decisions relating to fire safety and structural integrity. For fabric specification in a higher-risk building, it should contain the following for each fire-safety-relevant fabric decision. The fabric description — supplier, range name, colourway, width, and fibre composition. The fire standard the fabric is certified against — BS 7176 Medium or High Hazard, BS 5867 Part 2 Type B or C, or equivalent. The test certificate reference number and the name of the UKAS-accredited laboratory that issued it. The filling and interliner specified with the fabric, as the certificate covers the assembly rather than the face fabric alone. The date of installation and the location within the building. Any re-treatment or re-certification requirement and the recommended review date.

Building this documentation into the fabric specification process at Stage 3 of the RIBA Plan of Work — when specific fabrics are selected and technical data sheets are obtained — adds minimal time and significantly strengthens both legal compliance and the designer’s professional liability position. For guidance on fabric decisions at each RIBA stage, see our RIBA Plan of Work fabric guide.


Liability and the 30-Year Limitation Period

A 2025 Supreme Court ruling in URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd interpreted section 135(3) of the Building Safety Act to extend the limitation period for negligence claims relating to building safety from six to thirty years, including retrospective claims. This means that design decisions made today — including fabric specification decisions that affect fire safety in higher-risk buildings — could be subject to legal challenge for up to thirty years.

The practical implication for fabric specifiers is that the documentation of fire compliance at the time of specification — the fire test certificate, the specification schedule, the installation record — is evidence of due diligence that may need to be relied upon many years after practical completion. Maintaining systematic records of fire certification for all higher-risk building fabric specification decisions is strongly advisable.


What Interior Designers Should Do

Review your specification documentation process and confirm that it captures fire test certificate references, UKAS-accredited laboratory names, and filling and interliner details for every fabric specified in a fire-safety-relevant position. This applies to all contract projects, not only those classified as higher-risk buildings.

For any project that may involve an HRB — a residential building of seven or more storeys or 18 metres or more in height — seek advice from the Principal Designer appointed on the project about what fabric documentation is required as part of the golden thread. If you are the party being asked to act as Principal Designer, assess your competence against PAS 8671 before accepting the role.

Ensure your professional indemnity insurance covers the scope of design services you are providing on BSA-affected projects. The Act has introduced new and more extensive liabilities for designers, and cover that was adequate before 1 October 2023 may need to be reviewed.

When specifying fabric for fire-safety-relevant positions in higher-risk buildings, prefer inherently fire-resistant fabrics over those requiring topical FR treatment. Inherent fire resistance does not degrade with cleaning or over time and does not require re-certification during the building’s life. See our FR treatment and fibre compatibility guide for guidance on which fabrics carry inherent certification.


Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Building Safety Act apply to all interior design projects?

The duty-holder framework applies to all projects requiring building control approval in England where there is more than one contractor, from 1 October 2023. The additional and most stringent requirements apply to higher-risk buildings — residential buildings of at least 18 metres in height or at least seven storeys containing two or more residential units. Most interior refurbishment projects of individual apartments do not require building control approval and are not directly caught by the Act. Commercial fit-outs, whole-building refurbishments, and new build projects with residential use at seven or more storeys are more likely to be affected.

What fire standards apply to fabric in higher-risk buildings?

The Building Safety Act does not introduce new fire standards for fabrics. The applicable standards remain BS 7176 for upholstered seating, BS 5867 for curtains, and the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 for the responsible person’s ongoing fire safety obligations. What the Act changes is the documentation and accountability requirements around compliance with those standards — specifically the requirement to maintain a golden thread of fire safety design decisions for higher-risk buildings.

What is the golden thread and what fabric information does it need to contain?

The golden thread is a digitally maintained record of design decisions relating to fire safety and structural integrity. For fabric specification in a higher-risk building, it should contain the fabric description, the fire certification standard and certificate reference, the UKAS-accredited laboratory name, the filling and interliner details, the date and location of installation, and any re-treatment requirements. This information must be maintained for the life of the building.

Can an interior designer be the Principal Designer under the Building Safety Act?

Yes, if they have the necessary competence as defined by PAS 8671. An interior designer appointed as lead designer on a project with more than one contractor must assess whether their competence in fire safety, structural safety, and documentation management meets the standard required. For HRB projects, the competence requirements are more demanding and formal competence assessment against PAS 8671 is advisable before accepting the appointment.


For fire certification standards and test certificates, see our Crib 5 guide. For fabric documentation at each RIBA Plan of Work stage, see our RIBA Plan of Work fabric guide. For FR treatment and inherent fire resistance, see our FR treatment and fibre compatibility guide.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

BS 476 Part 7: Surface Spread of Flame for Wall and Ceiling Linings

BS 476 Part 7: Surface Spread of Flame for Wall and Ceiling Linings

What it tests: How quickly flame spreads across the surface of a material when exposed to a heat source. Relevant to wall panels, ceiling linings, acoustic panels, and fabric wall coverings.
The four classes: Class 1 is the most restrictive — very limited spread of flame. Class 4 is the least restrictive. Class 0 is a composite designation covering Class 1 surface spread of flame plus a non-combustibility requirement.
What it does not test: Upholstery fire performance. BS 476 Part 7 is a surface lining test, not an upholstery test. Crib 5 and BS 7176 cover upholstered seating.
Who requires it: Building control for non-domestic buildings; the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 for occupied non-domestic premises.

Interior designers specifying fabric for wall panels, acoustic panels, and decorative wall linings in commercial environments need to understand BS 476 Part 7 alongside the upholstery fire standards. Where Crib 5 and BS 7176 cover the fire performance of upholstered seating, BS 476 Part 7 covers how quickly flame spreads across surfaces — walls, ceilings, and the materials covering them. The two standards address different fire risks and apply to different elements of an interior specification.


What BS 476 Part 7 Tests

BS 476 Part 7 is the British Standard method for testing the surface spread of flame of building products. It measures how far and how fast a flame travels across the surface of a material when one end is exposed to a defined heat source. The test is conducted on a sample 900 mm long by 225 mm wide, mounted vertically on a radiant heat panel. A pilot flame is applied at one end and the spread of flame along the sample is measured at 90 seconds, 3 minutes, and 10 minutes from ignition.

The results determine which of the four BS 476 Part 7 classes the material achieves. The test is separate from, and not interchangeable with, the upholstery tests. A fabric that passes BS 476 Part 7 Class 1 is certified for use as a surface lining material. This certification says nothing about its performance as an upholstery fabric under Crib 5 or BS 7176 ignition sources.


The Four Classes

Class 1 is the most restrictive classification. Flame spread at 90 seconds must not exceed 165 mm and at 10 minutes must not exceed 165 mm. Class 1 is required for walls and ceilings in most circulation areas, corridors, stairways, and escape routes in non-domestic buildings under the Building Regulations. For fabric wall panels in commercial interiors, Class 1 is the specification that most building control officers and fire risk assessors will expect in occupied non-domestic premises.

Class 0 is not defined within BS 476 Part 7 itself. It is a composite classification used in Approved Document B requiring Class 1 surface spread of flame and additionally meeting non-combustibility or limited combustibility requirements to BS 476 Part 11 or Part 4. Most fabric materials cannot achieve Class 0. Glass fibre and mineral fabrics can. For most commercial interior projects, Class 1 is the practical target for fabric wall linings.

Class 2 is acceptable for wall linings in lower-risk areas of some non-domestic buildings where Class 1 is not explicitly required. In practice, specifiers should aim for Class 1 across commercial interiors to provide a consistent and defensible specification.

Class 3 is the minimum permitted for wall linings in domestic rooms and some low-risk areas of non-domestic buildings under Approved Document B. Not appropriate for escape routes, corridors, or high-occupancy commercial spaces.

Class 4 does not meet any acceptable Building Regulations standard for wall or ceiling linings in habitable spaces.


BS EN 13501-1: The European Equivalent

The European reaction to fire classification system, BS EN 13501-1, uses Euroclass ratings — A1, A2, B, C, D, E, F — with additional designations for smoke production and flaming droplet behaviour. BS 476 Part 7 Class 1 is approximately equivalent to Euroclass B or C. BS 476 Part 7 Class 0 is approximately equivalent to Euroclass B with s1, d0 designations. These are not exact equivalences.

For wall panel and acoustic panel fabric specification in the UK, it is safest to request a BS 476 Part 7 test result specifically from the supplier rather than relying on Euroclass conversion, unless the building control officer for the specific project has confirmed acceptance of Euroclass ratings as equivalent.


Fabric Applications Requiring BS 476 Part 7

Fabric-covered wall panels, whether fixed directly to the wall or suspended on a batten system, form a wall lining. The fabric and any interliner or backing material must be tested together as the composite assembly. A fabric that achieves Class 1 as a face fabric may not achieve Class 1 when applied over a foam interliner, because the combined assembly’s performance depends on all layers.

Acoustic fabric panels installed on walls for sound absorption purposes are wall linings and require BS 476 Part 7 classification. The acoustic infill material — typically mineral wool or acoustic foam — affects the composite panel’s classification. Mineral wool infill is non-combustible. Polyurethane acoustic foam typically achieves Class 2 or 3 at best and will limit the composite panel’s classification accordingly.

Fabric wall coverings applied over plaster or plasterboard similarly form a wall lining. The surface to which the fabric is applied affects the test result, so the fabric should be tested in the configuration as installed.

Headboards in hotel bedrooms are treated as furniture rather than wall linings and are therefore subject to the upholstery standards — Crib 5 and BS 7176 — rather than BS 476 Part 7. For full guidance on headboard specification, see our wall panels and headboards guide.


Achieving Class 1 with Fabric

Most uncoated natural-fibre fabrics will not achieve BS 476 Part 7 Class 1 without topical FR treatment. Cotton, linen, and viscose fabrics ignite readily and will typically achieve only Class 3 or Class 4 without treatment. Wool and mohair have significantly better inherent fire resistance but still typically require treatment to achieve Class 1 for wall lining applications.

Topical FR treatment — typically wet-padding with intumescent or phosphorus-based compounds — can raise most cellulosic fabrics from Class 3 or 4 to Class 1. The treatment must be applied by a UKAS-accredited treatment company and the treated assembly must be tested as a composite with the backing and fixings used in the actual installation. For guidance on FR treatment and dye interaction risks, see our dye types and FR treatment guide.

Some polyester fabrics with inherent flame retardant additives — including Trevira CS — can achieve Class 1 without topical treatment, with better long-term durability than treated natural-fibre fabrics.


Testing and Certification

BS 476 Part 7 certificates must be issued by a UKAS-accredited testing laboratory. A supplier’s own claim that a fabric meets Class 1 is not sufficient for building control purposes. The certificate should specify the fabric tested, the configuration tested including backing materials and fixings, the test standard, and the classification achieved.

For composite wall panel systems, the certificate should cover the full assembly rather than the face fabric in isolation. Testing the face fabric alone and assuming the assembly will achieve the same classification is not reliable.

Certificates should be retained for the life of the installation and included in the building’s fire safety documentation. For projects subject to the Building Safety Act 2022, the classification certificates for all wall lining materials form part of the golden thread. See our Building Safety Act guide for documentation requirements.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between BS 476 Part 7 and BS 5852 Crib 5?

BS 476 Part 7 tests surface spread of flame on wall and ceiling lining materials. BS 5852 Crib 5 tests the fire resistance of upholstered seating assemblies. They test different products under different fire scenarios and one certification does not substitute for the other. A fabric certified to BS 476 Part 7 Class 1 for wall panel use requires separate Crib 5 testing if it is also to be used for upholstered seating in the same project.

Do headboards in hotel rooms need BS 476 Part 7 certification?

No. Headboards are classified as furniture and are subject to BS 5852 and BS 7176, not the surface lining standards. A headboard fixed to the wall does not become a wall lining by being attached. Confirm the applicable standard with the building control officer or fire risk assessor for the specific project if there is any doubt.

What does Class 0 mean and can fabric achieve it?

Class 0 is a composite designation in the Building Regulations requiring Class 1 surface spread of flame and additionally meeting non-combustibility or limited combustibility requirements. Most fabric materials cannot achieve Class 0. Glass fibre and mineral fabrics can. For most commercial interior projects, Class 1 is the practical target for fabric wall linings.

Does the fabric or the whole wall panel assembly need to be tested?

The whole assembly — face fabric, interliner, backing, and fixing method — should be tested together. Testing the face fabric in isolation and assuming the composite assembly will achieve the same classification is unreliable, because the thermal behaviour of backing materials significantly affects the test result.

How does BS 476 Part 7 relate to BS EN 13501-1?

BS EN 13501-1 is the European reaction to fire classification using Euroclasses A1 to F. BS 476 Part 7 Class 1 is approximately equivalent to Euroclass B or C, though the equivalence is not exact. For UK projects, always request BS 476 Part 7 results specifically unless the building control officer has confirmed acceptance of Euroclass ratings for the specific project.


For wall panel and headboard fire specification, see our wall panels and headboards guide. For upholstery fire standards, see our Crib 5 guide. For FR treatment guidance, see our FR treatment and fibre compatibility guide.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

Wyzenbeek vs Martindale: Which Abrasion Test Should You Specify?

Wyzenbeek vs Martindale: Which Abrasion Test Should You Specify?

Martindale: The standard used in the UK and Europe. Fabric is rubbed in a figure-of-eight motion against a worsted wool abradant. Results in rub counts. Contract minimum 30,000 rubs.
Wyzenbeek: The standard used in the United States. Fabric is rubbed back and forth in straight lines against a cotton duck canvas abradant. Results in double rubs. Contract minimum 15,000 double rubs.
Are they comparable? No. The two tests use different abradants, different motions, and different pass criteria. A Wyzenbeek double rub count cannot be converted to a Martindale rub count.
Which to specify: For UK and European projects, always specify Martindale. For US projects, specify Wyzenbeek. For international projects, request both where possible.

Interior designers working internationally, or sourcing fabric from American suppliers, regularly encounter both Martindale rub counts and Wyzenbeek double rub counts on specification sheets. The two figures look similar — both express abrasion resistance as a number — but they are produced by entirely different test methods and cannot be meaningfully compared. Specifying a Wyzenbeek result on a UK contract project, or a Martindale result on a US project, risks misaligned expectations with clients, contractors, and insurers. This guide explains how each test works, what the results mean, and how to specify correctly for UK and international projects.


The Martindale Test

The Martindale abrasion test is defined by ISO 12947 and BS EN ISO 12947. It is the standard abrasion test used across the UK, Europe, and most international markets outside the United States. When a fabric data sheet lists a rub count without specifying the test method, the default assumption in UK specification is Martindale.

The test works as follows. A circular sample of the fabric being tested is mounted face-down on a machine and rubbed against a standard abradant — a piece of worsted wool fabric — in a figure-of-eight motion that moves the sample across the abradant in all directions simultaneously. This multidirectional motion is designed to replicate the complex, non-linear abrasion that upholstery fabric experiences in real use. The machine counts each complete figure-of-eight cycle as one rub.

The test is run to one of several endpoints. The most common endpoint for upholstery fabrics is fabric breakdown — the point at which two threads have broken or a hole has appeared in the sample. Some test houses also assess and report pilling at intermediate intervals using a separate grading scale. The total rub count at breakdown is the Martindale rub count reported on the data sheet.

For a complete guide to Martindale thresholds by application and what the numbers mean in practice, see our Martindale rub test guide.


The Wyzenbeek Test

The Wyzenbeek abrasion test is defined by ASTM D4157, the American Society for Testing and Materials standard. It is the dominant abrasion test in the US contract furniture and upholstery market. UK designers sourcing fabric from American suppliers, or specifying for projects with US compliance requirements, will encounter Wyzenbeek results on data sheets.

The test works as follows. A rectangular sample of the fabric being tested is mounted on a machine and rubbed back and forth in straight lines — first in the warp direction, then in the weft direction — against a standard abradant. The standard abradant specified by ASTM D4157 is cotton duck canvas, a tightly woven plain-weave cotton fabric significantly more abrasive than the worsted wool used in Martindale. Each complete back-and-forth cycle counts as one double rub.

The Wyzenbeek test runs until the fabric shows noticeable wear or breakdown, and the double rub count at that point is reported. The linear back-and-forth motion differs fundamentally from the multidirectional figure-of-eight motion of Martindale, which is why the two tests produce results that cannot be directly compared.


Why the Results Cannot Be Compared

The most important point for a specifier to understand is that 50,000 Martindale rubs and 50,000 Wyzenbeek double rubs do not represent the same level of abrasion resistance. They are measurements from different instruments using different abradants, different motion patterns, and assessed against different pass criteria.

The cotton duck canvas abradant used in Wyzenbeek is more aggressive than the worsted wool abradant used in Martindale. All else being equal, a fabric tested to Wyzenbeek will reach its endpoint faster than the same fabric tested to Martindale, because the abradant is harsher. This means Wyzenbeek counts tend to be lower than Martindale counts on equivalent fabrics.

However, this relationship is not consistent across all fabric types. Different fibres and constructions respond differently to the two abradants and the two motion patterns. There is no reliable conversion factor between Wyzenbeek double rubs and Martindale rubs. Various informal conversion ratios circulate in the trade — most commonly the suggestion that one Wyzenbeek double rub equals approximately two Martindale rubs — but this ratio has no scientific basis and should not be relied upon for specification.

The only reliable way to compare two fabrics on a like-for-like basis is to ensure both have been tested to the same standard. When building a specification, always confirm which test method produced the figures on the data sheet.


UK and European Thresholds: Martindale

The following thresholds represent current UK and European contract specification practice for Martindale rub counts. For full detail on each threshold and the reasoning behind it, see our Martindale rub test guide.

Light domestic use: 15,000 rubs minimum. Heavy domestic use: 25,000 rubs minimum. Light contract: 30,000 rubs minimum. General contract — hotel lobbies, restaurant seating, office seating: 50,000 to 60,000 rubs. Heavy contract: 80,000 to 100,000 rubs. Severe contract: 100,000 rubs and above.


US Thresholds: Wyzenbeek

The following thresholds are used in the US contract market for Wyzenbeek double rubs. They are not equivalent to the Martindale thresholds above and should not be compared directly.

Residential use: 9,000 to 15,000 double rubs minimum. Light commercial: 15,000 double rubs minimum. Heavy commercial — hotels, restaurants, office seating: 30,000 to 50,000 double rubs. Severe commercial: 100,000 double rubs.


Which Test to Specify and When

For any project in the UK or continental Europe, always specify Martindale to ISO 12947. This is the expected standard, the one UK test houses use, and the one UK and European contract furniture manufacturers certify their fabrics against. If a fabric supplier provides only a Wyzenbeek result and cannot provide a Martindale result, request that the fabric be tested to Martindale before specifying it for a UK contract project.

For projects in the United States, specify Wyzenbeek to ASTM D4157. For international hospitality projects drawing from both European and American suppliers, request both test results where possible and compare within the same test method rather than across methods.

For yacht and marine projects, the fire standard takes precedence over abrasion performance. See our IMO marine fire standards guide.


Pilling: A Separate Test

Both Martindale and Wyzenbeek measure abrasion resistance — structural wear of the yarn. Neither measures pilling resistance, which is the formation of surface fibre balls through tangling of loose fibre ends. Pilling is assessed by a separate test, ISO 12945-2, also run on the Martindale machine but using a different abradant and a different assessment scale. A fabric with an excellent Martindale abrasion count may still pill badly in use. Always request both the Martindale abrasion result and the ISO 12945-2 pilling grade for contract upholstery specification. See our pilling resistance guide.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Martindale and Wyzenbeek?

Martindale rubs the fabric sample in a multidirectional figure-of-eight motion against a worsted wool abradant, counting each cycle as one rub. Wyzenbeek rubs the fabric back and forth in straight lines against a cotton duck canvas abradant, counting each back-and-forth cycle as one double rub. The abradants, motions, and pass criteria are different. The results cannot be directly compared.

Can I convert Wyzenbeek double rubs to Martindale rubs?

No reliable conversion factor exists. Informal ratios circulate in the trade but have no scientific basis and produce unreliable results across different fabric types. The only reliable approach is to test the same fabric to both standards.

What Martindale count should I specify for a hotel?

For hotel bedroom seating: 30,000 rubs minimum. For hotel restaurant and lobby seating: 50,000 to 60,000 rubs. For hotel bar and high-traffic areas: 80,000 to 100,000 rubs. See our hotel fabric specification guide for full detail.

Is Wyzenbeek used in the UK?

Wyzenbeek is not the standard abrasion test in the UK. Martindale to ISO 12947 is the expected test for UK and European contract specification. Wyzenbeek results may appear on data sheets from American suppliers. Always confirm which test standard produced the figures before using them in a UK specification.

What abradant does Martindale use?

The standard Martindale abradant for upholstery fabric testing is worsted wool fabric to ISO 12947-2. Results against different abradants are not directly comparable. Always confirm the abradant used when reviewing a Martindale certificate.


For Martindale thresholds by application, see our Martindale rub test guide. For pilling resistance, see our pilling resistance guide. For hotel specification, see our hotel fabric specification guide.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

Top UK Interior Designers 2026: London and National

Top UK Interior Designers 2026: London and National

The following is a curated reference list of interior design studios and practitioners active in the UK in 2026, compiled for homeowners, property developers, and clients seeking design representation for residential and commercial projects. The list is organised by location — London studios first, followed by national coverage — and listed alphabetically within each section. No ranking is implied. All studios listed were active and accepting new commissions at the time of compilation.

Kothea is a trade-only supplier of luxury fabrics based in London. We supply fabric directly to interior designers and architects. If you are a homeowner seeking a designer, the studios below can advise on the full range of fabric options available through trade accounts.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

London Studios

Beata Heuman. Stockholm-born, London-based, Beata Heuman’s studio produces interiors of playful sophistication — bold colour, idiosyncratic furniture, and a distinctive blend of Scandinavian restraint with maximal personality. Her residential work has been widely published and her aesthetic is among the most recognisable in contemporary London design. Website: beataheuman.com

BradyWilliams. Founded by Shayne Brady and Emily Williams, BradyWilliams offers a comprehensive bespoke interior design service for residential and commercial clients. Known for acute detailing, timeless design, and strong project management, the studio operates across London and internationally. Website: studioshaynebrady.com

Buchanan Studio. Led by Jessica Maybury, Buchanan Studio specialises in high-end residential projects with an emphasis on craftsmanship, natural materials, and considered materiality. The studio’s work has a quiet confidence and a strong understanding of bespoke joinery and architectural detail. Website: buchanan.studio

David Collins Studio. One of London’s most established luxury design studios, founded in 1985. The studio — now led by Iain Watson and Simon Rawlings — has defined interiors at iconic London locations and continues to work across hospitality, retail, and high-end residential. Known for layered palettes and architectural precision. Website: davidcollins.studio

Design Haus Liberty. Founded by Dara Huang, Design Haus Liberty blends mid-century and contemporary European influences across residential and commercial projects. The studio has worked with Four Seasons, Cartier, and LVMH alongside a significant private residential portfolio. Website: dhliberty.com

Elicyon. A luxury studio based in Kensington, led by Charu Gandhi. Elicyon works across interior design, interior architecture, and project management on some of London’s most prominent prime residential developments including One Hyde Park, with an international portfolio extending to Dubai, Monaco, and Singapore. Website: elicyon.com

Fran Hickman Design and Interiors. Fran Hickman’s studio is characterised by bold colour, pattern, and confident maximalism. Her residential work is full of personality and her commercial portfolio includes Soho House properties. A strong choice for clients who want distinctive, colour-forward interiors. Website: franhickman.com

Kelly Hoppen Interiors. A global name in luxury interior design, Kelly Hoppen’s studio is known for its East-meets-West aesthetic — neutral palettes, geometric precision, and harmonious spatial composition. The studio has worked on celebrity homes, luxury yachts, hotels, and aircraft. Website: kellyhoppeninteriors.com

Katharine Pooley. Katharine Pooley’s Knightsbridge studio produces polished, sophisticated interiors for the most discerning clients. Her work spans Mayfair and Belgravia townhouses through to international luxury residences and is consistently among the most refined in the London luxury market. Website: katharinepooley.com

Lawson Robb. Lawson Robb bridges architecture and interior design with particular expertise in high-end residential and superyacht interiors. The studio’s technical capability — integrating complex AV, lighting, and environmental systems seamlessly into the interior — sets it apart from purely decorative practices. Website: lawsonrobb.com

Martin Brudnizki Design Studio. Founded in 2000, MBDS is known for bold, timeless, and immersive spaces across hospitality, retail, and residential. Notable projects include Annabel’s, Bacchanalia, and numerous hotel and restaurant interiors in London and New York. Website: mbds.com

Natalia Miyar. Cuban-American designer Natalia Miyar brings an international perspective to London’s design scene. Her interiors are glamorous, refined, and impeccably detailed, with a particular strength in luxury residential. Her studio has grown rapidly since its founding and is among the most watched in the current London market. Website: nataliamiyar.com

Nicky Haslam Design. Nicky Haslam is one of Britain’s most celebrated decorators, internationally renowned for original, glamorous, and authoritatively realised commissions spanning decades. His studio continues to work across residential, hospitality, and commercial projects. Website: nickyhaslamstudio.com

Nina Campbell. Nina Campbell established her practice and shop in 1974 and remains one of the most respected and influential interior designers in the world. Known for stylish, characterful interiors and for her own collections of fabrics and wallpapers, her studio continues to deliver residential and commercial commissions of the highest quality. Website: ninacampbell.com

Oliver Burns. Led by Sharon Lillywhite, Oliver Burns Studio has become an esteemed practice serving some of the world’s wealthiest families and luxury property developers. The studio’s focus on thoughtful luxury, artisanal sourcing, and narrative-led design has produced a client list spanning Belgravia townhouses to international country estates. Website: oliverburns.com

Retrouvius. Not a conventional design studio — Retrouvius specialises in architectural salvage and designing interiors around reclaimed materials. The results are entirely unique: spaces with genuine material history and character that cannot be replicated with new materials. A first choice for clients who want sustainability and authenticity above all. Website: retrouvius.com

Rose Uniacke. Working from her Pimlico Road showroom — part gallery, part antique shop, part design studio — Rose Uniacke creates interiors of extraordinary calm and refinement. Spare, elegant rooms furnished with carefully sourced antiques and her own furniture line. Among the most admired British designers of her generation. Website: roseuniacke.com

Sibyl Colefax and John Fowler. The most venerable name in English decoration, with a client list spanning generations of aristocratic and distinguished families. The current team maintains the firm’s tradition of scholarly, comfortable English country house style while remaining fully contemporary in its approach. Website: sibylcolefax.com

Staffan Tollgård Design Group. An award-winning architectural interior design practice offering a bold take on residential interiors. Staffan Tollgård’s style draws on Asian and Scandinavian functionalism combined with a strong appreciation of furniture as sculptural art. Website: tollgard.com

Studio Ashby. Sophie Ashby’s studio is one of the most consistently exciting in London — warm, layered interiors that mix mid-century pieces with contemporary art and artisan-made objects. Recent projects include The Whiteley development in Bayswater and a growing hospitality portfolio. Website: studioashby.com

Studio Hessian. Scarlett Hessian trained as an architect and brings a rigorous spatial intelligence to residential and commercial interiors. The studio has a significant international presence across London, Stockholm, and the west coast of the United States. Website: studiohessian.com

Taylor Howes. Taylor Howes Designs operates across prime central London and international markets, delivering sophisticated, elegantly layered interiors for high-net-worth residential clients with an established presence in Mayfair, Knightsbridge, and Chelsea. Website: taylorhowes.co.uk


National Coverage

Ben Pentreath. Based in Dorset with a London office, Ben Pentreath is among the most respected English decorators working today. His interiors draw on a deep knowledge of English architectural history and decorating tradition — layered, colourful, and deeply comfortable. His influence on a generation of younger British designers is significant. Website: benpentreath.com

Eadie and Crole. Founded in 2019 by Sophie Eade and Fi Crole, Eadie and Crole operates from Hampshire with a portfolio spanning London townhouses and country house projects across the south of England. Known for elegant, understated interiors that pair subtle hues and natural textures with antiques and contemporary art. Website: eadieandcrole.com

Emily Smoor Interiors. Based in Edinburgh, Emily Smoor’s practice began as an upholstery studio and evolved into full residential and commercial interior design. Her interiors are eclectic, texture-rich, and characterised by a talent for sourcing and combining pieces from different eras and places. Website: fantoush.com

Henry Prideaux Interior Design. Henry Prideaux offers sophisticated, practical schemes notable for unexpected and extraordinary moments. Based from a showroom-studio in Twickenham with a portfolio of residential projects across London and the home counties. Website: henryprideaux.com

Max Rollitt. Max Rollitt is an interior designer, furniture-maker, and antiques dealer working from his Hampshire showroom at Yavington Barn. His interiors are distinctive for their layers of colour, texture, and history — richly composed rooms drawing on antiques, bespoke furniture, and a sophisticated understanding of English decoration. Website: maxrollitt.com

Rita Konig. British-born Rita Konig is a sought-after talent on both sides of the Atlantic, known for her acute understanding of comfortable, personal, and quietly stylish interiors. Her recent collections with Schumacher have further established her international profile. Website: ritakonig.com

SHH Architecture and Interiors. SHH is a London-headquartered practice with a national reach, known for bold palettes, architectural confidence, and exacting detail across residential, hospitality, and commercial projects. Listed in Country and Town House’s 50 Best Interior Designers in the UK in 2025 and 2026. Website: shh.co.uk

Sims Hilditch. Sims Hilditch operates from the Cotswolds and London, specialising in English country houses and town houses. The studio is known for warm, layered interiors that combine strong architectural understanding with a fine eye for antiques, textiles, and colour. Website: simshilditch.com


This list is updated periodically. If you are an interior designer or studio and would like to be considered for inclusion in a future edition, contact us via kothea.com/contact.

Kothea supplies trade fabric to interior designers and architects.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

Pilling Resistance in Upholstery Fabric: A Guide for Interior Designers

Silk Velvet Upholstery Mohair

Pilling Resistance in Upholstery Fabric: A Guide for Interior Designers

What pilling is: Small balls of tangled fibre that form on the fabric surface through friction and use, altering appearance even when the fabric remains structurally intact.
The test: ISO 12945-2 Martindale pilling test, graded 1 to 5. Grade 5 is no change. Grade 4 is slight surface fuzzing. Grade 3 is moderate pilling. Contract minimum is grade 4.
Highest pilling risk: Short-staple fibre blends, loosely twisted yarns, natural-synthetic blends.
Lowest pilling risk: Long-staple natural fibres, tightly twisted yarns, high-density weaves, mohair velvet.

A fabric can achieve 80,000 Martindale rubs and still pill badly. Abrasion resistance and pilling resistance are distinct properties measured by different tests. A fabric that resists structural wear may nevertheless develop an unsightly surface of small fibre balls within months of use, fundamentally altering its appearance without any yarn breaking. For pile fabrics in particular, pilling can destroy the visual quality of a fabric long before its structural integrity is compromised. This guide explains what causes pilling, how it is tested, which fabrics carry the highest and lowest risk, and what to specify to avoid problems in contract use.

For abrasion resistance and Martindale rub counts, see our Martindale rub test guide. For velvet types and their performance characteristics, see our velvet types compared guide.


What Causes Pilling

Pilling begins when individual fibres work free from the yarn structure through friction and mechanical stress. Loose fibre ends at the surface of the fabric are caught by adjacent surfaces and tangled together into small balls. These balls remain attached to the fabric by the fibres still anchored within the yarn, which is why they do not simply fall off. The ball continues to grow as more loose fibres are captured and incorporated into it.

The size and tenacity of pills varies by fibre type. Natural fibres produce pills that are relatively fragile and may eventually detach from the fabric surface through continued friction. Synthetic fibres produce pills that are anchored by stronger fibres that do not break under continued use. The pills grow, persist, and resist removal. This is why fabrics containing synthetic fibres often pill more visibly and permanently than pure natural-fibre fabrics.

Blended fabrics often pill worst of all. The short, weak natural fibres break loose from the yarn easily, producing the loose ends that form pill nuclei. The stronger synthetic fibres then anchor the pills to the fabric surface, preventing them from detaching. The result is persistent, anchored pills formed from natural fibre content but held in place by synthetic fibre anchors.


The Pilling Test: ISO 12945-2

Pilling resistance is tested to ISO 12945-2 using the Martindale machine with a different abradant. For pilling assessment, the fabric sample is rubbed against itself rather than against a worsted wool abradant. The machine runs for a defined number of cycles and the sample is then assessed visually against reference photographs and graded on a scale of 1 to 5.

Grade 5 indicates no change. Grade 4 indicates slight surface fuzzing or early-stage pilling, barely visible in normal viewing conditions. Grade 3 indicates moderate pilling, noticeable in normal use. Grade 2 indicates distinct pilling. Grade 1 indicates severe, dense pilling across the whole surface.

The test is typically run at 125, 500, 1000, and 2000 cycles. A fabric assessed at 2000 cycles with a grade of 4 or above is considered acceptable for contract upholstery use. The contract minimum is grade 4. A fabric achieving grade 3 at 2000 cycles will show noticeable pilling in use and is not appropriate for contract seating applications regardless of its Martindale abrasion count.


Fibre Types and Pilling Risk

Mohair. Lowest pilling risk of all natural-fibre velvets. The long-staple mohair fibre has fewer free ends per unit length of yarn than short-staple fibres. Fewer free ends means fewer pill nuclei. The smooth surface of the mohair fibre also means that free ends slide rather than tangle, reducing the rate of pill formation. Mohair velvet in contract grades typically achieves grade 4 to 5 at 2000 cycles.

Wool. Low to moderate pilling risk depending on fibre length and yarn construction. Merino wool pills less than coarser short-staple wool. Tightly spun wool yarns pill less than loosely spun yarns of the same fibre.

Cotton. Moderate pilling risk. Short-staple cotton varieties pill more than long-staple varieties such as Egyptian or Pima cotton. Cotton velvet is more susceptible to pilling than mohair velvet because cotton fibres are shorter and the pile construction exposes more free ends per unit area.

Linen. Low pilling risk. Linen is a long-staple bast fibre. The fibre length and relatively smooth surface reduce pill formation compared to cotton.

Polyester. High pilling persistence if it pills at all. Synthetic fibres anchor pills rather than allowing them to detach. When pills do form they are tenacious.

Natural-synthetic blends. Highest pilling risk in practice. Specifying blends for contract upholstery requires specific pilling grade confirmation, not just Martindale abrasion data.


Construction Factors That Affect Pilling

Yarn twist affects pilling directly. A high-twist yarn locks fibres into the yarn structure more firmly, reducing the number of free ends exposed at the surface. A low-twist yarn allows fibres to work free more easily. Two fabrics of the same fibre and weight can have very different pilling grades depending on the yarn construction.

Weave density affects pilling by controlling the movement of yarns at the fabric surface. A tight, dense weave restricts yarn movement and reduces the abrasion between adjacent yarns that generates free fibre ends.

Pile construction in velvet affects pilling through pile height and density. A short, dense pile has fewer exposed free ends per unit area than a long, open pile of the same fibre. Contract-grade velvet is typically specified with a denser, shorter pile than residential velvet partly for this reason.


Pilling in Use: What Clients Experience

Pilling in upholstery is most visible in areas of sustained friction — seat cushions where clothing rubs against the fabric, and armrests. In a hotel or restaurant environment, denim in particular is highly abrasive and accelerates pilling. Pilling is not repairable in the way that surface staining can sometimes be treated. A pilled fabric requires either mechanical depilling — a temporary intervention — or replacement. Brief clients on pilling risk at the point of specification, particularly for natural-fibre pile fabrics in contract environments.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between pilling and abrasion?

Abrasion is the physical wearing away of yarn structure through friction, measured by Martindale rub count. Pilling is the formation of surface fibre balls through the tangling of loose fibre ends, measured separately by ISO 12945-2. A fabric can have a very high Martindale abrasion count and still pill badly. Both should be confirmed before specifying a fabric for contract use.

What pilling grade should I specify for contract upholstery?

Grade 4 minimum to ISO 12945-2 at 2000 cycles. For high-traffic environments, grade 4 to 5 is a more defensible specification. Always confirm the grade for the specific colourway being ordered, as pilling grades can vary between colourways in the same range.

Does mohair velvet pill?

Mohair velvet has the lowest pilling risk of any natural-fibre velvet due to the long staple length and smooth surface of the mohair fibre. Contract-grade mohair velvet typically achieves grade 4 to 5 at 2000 cycles. It is the most pill-resistant natural-fibre velvet available for contract upholstery.

Why do natural-synthetic blend fabrics pill so badly?

Natural-synthetic blends combine the pill-forming tendency of short natural fibres with the pill-anchoring strength of synthetic fibres. The result is persistent, anchored pills that grow with continued use. Blended fabrics for contract use require specific pilling grade confirmation before specifying.


For abrasion test method differences between Martindale and Wyzenbeek, see our Wyzenbeek vs Martindale guide.

For abrasion resistance, see our Martindale rub test guide. For velvet types and contract suitability, see our velvet types compared guide.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

How FR Treatment Works: A Plain-English Guide for Interior Designers

Black Faux Leather Chair

How FR Treatment Works: A Plain-English Guide for Interior Designers

What FR treatment does: It slows or prevents the ignition and spread of flame by interfering with the chemistry of combustion at the surface of the fabric.
The two main methods: Back-coating (paste applied to the reverse — standard for upholstery Crib 5) and wet padding (chemical solution applied to the whole fabric — standard for curtain treatment).
Inherent vs topical: Inherent fire resistance is a permanent property of the fibre itself. Topical treatment is applied after weaving and can degrade over time, through cleaning, or through interaction with certain dyes.
Who can certify: Only a UKAS-accredited testing laboratory. No fabric company, designer, or treatment provider can self-certify.

Most interior designers who specify FR-treated fabrics regularly have never seen the treatment process and have only a general idea of how it works. This guide explains the chemistry and process in plain language — not to make designers into treatment specialists, but to give them enough understanding to ask the right questions, spot specification risks before they become problems, and explain FR compliance confidently to clients and contractors.

For which fibres can be treated, see our FR treatment and fibre compatibility guide. For dye types and their interaction with treatment, see our dye types and FR treatment guide. For the fire standards that require treatment, see our Crib 5 guide.


Why Fabrics Need FR Treatment

All organic fibres will burn if exposed to sufficient heat and ignition energy. The chemistry of combustion in textiles follows a consistent pattern. When a fibre is heated, its polymer structure begins to break down — a process called pyrolysis. This produces flammable gases. The gases mix with oxygen from the atmosphere and ignite, producing a flame. The flame generates further heat, which causes more pyrolysis, which produces more flammable gas, which sustains and spreads the fire. This self-reinforcing cycle is what makes unprotected upholstery and curtains a serious fire hazard in public buildings.

FR treatment breaks this cycle at one or more points. Depending on the type of FR compound used, it may prevent or delay pyrolysis, reduce the quantity or flammability of the gases produced, cause the fabric to form a carbonaceous char layer that insulates the underlying structure from the heat source, or dilute the flammable gases with inert gases that cannot sustain combustion. The goal in all cases is the same: to prevent the fabric from sustaining ignition and propagating flame when exposed to the ignition sources defined in the test standard.


The Two Main Treatment Methods

Back-coating. The standard method for upholstery Crib 5 treatment. The fabric is passed through a machine that applies a paste or emulsion of FR chemicals to the reverse face of the fabric. The paste is then dried and cured to fix the compound to the backing structure. The treatment sits on the back face and does not penetrate the face yarns. This is why back-coating, when correctly applied, does not alter the appearance or handle of the face fabric.

The FR compounds used in back-coating are typically phosphorus-based or halogenated compounds — most commonly brominated flame retardants applied in a paste that also contains a binder to hold the compound to the fabric. The phosphorus compounds work primarily in the solid phase: when heated, they decompose to form phosphoric acid, which causes the polymer to char rather than produce flammable gases. The halogenated compounds work primarily in the gas phase: they release halogen radicals that interrupt the chain reactions sustaining the flame.

Back-coating adds weight to the fabric — typically a few grams per square metre — and gives the reverse a firmer, slightly stiffer character. This can be an advantage in upholstery construction because the stiffer back helps the fabric behave consistently during cutting and making-up. It does not affect the face pile character of velvet or the handle of the woven face.

Wet padding. The standard method for curtain FR treatment and some lighter upholstery fabrics. The fabric is fed through a padder — a bath of FR chemical solution followed by rollers that squeeze the solution into the fabric structure under controlled pressure — and then dried and cured. The wet pickup is controlled to achieve the required chemical loading. Because the solution penetrates the whole fabric including the face yarns, wet padding can affect handle and, critically, can interact with certain dye types. See the dye types and FR treatment guide for the specific risks.

The FR compounds used in curtain wet padding are typically water-soluble inorganic salts — ammonium phosphate or ammonium sulphate compounds — applied in aqueous solution. These are effective for cellulosic fibres and work primarily by releasing inert gases when heated that dilute the flammable gas mixture around the burning fabric. They are less suitable for upholstery because they are water-soluble and would wash out in cleaning. Back-coating compounds are insoluble and more durable.


Inherent Fire Resistance vs Topical Treatment

The distinction between inherent and topical fire resistance is commercially significant and frequently misunderstood.

Inherent fire resistance is a permanent property of the fibre itself, arising from its chemical structure. Wool and mohair have inherent fire resistance because they are protein fibres with high nitrogen and sulphur content. These elements make the fibre self-extinguishing — when the ignition source is removed, the fibre stops burning. No chemical treatment is required and no treatment can be washed away. The fire resistance is permanent for the life of the fabric.

Trevira CS is an inherently flame-retardant synthetic fibre. The flame-retardant chemical is incorporated into the polyester polymer during fibre production, not applied to the surface afterwards. Like mohair, the fire resistance is permanent and survives cleaning.

Topical treatment applies FR chemicals to the fabric after it has been woven or knitted. The chemicals are not part of the fibre structure — they sit on or within the fabric surface. This means they can potentially be degraded by cleaning, by mechanical abrasion over time, or by interaction with atmospheric pollutants or incompatible dyes. The degree to which this happens depends on the specific FR compound, the fabric construction, and the cleaning regime.

Back-coated fabrics retain their FR properties well under normal contract cleaning conditions because the back-coating compound is insoluble and mechanically fixed to the backing structure. The relevant risk is the dye interaction problem in wet-padded fabrics described in the dye types guide rather than the physical removal of the compound.

For contract environments where cleaning frequency is high — healthcare, transport seating, hotel restaurants — the distinction between inherent and topical certification carries practical weight. A fabric whose fire resistance survives aggressive cleaning without needing re-treatment or re-certification is operationally simpler and more reliably compliant over its full service life.


The Testing and Certification Process

FR treatment produces a claim of compliance. The claim must be verified by an independent test before it has any legal or commercial standing.

The test is conducted by a UKAS-accredited testing laboratory. The fabric and, for composite tests such as BS 7176, the filling material as well, are prepared and tested against the relevant ignition sources. For BS 5852 Crib 5, the ignition source is a wooden crib of defined dimensions and mass placed at the junction between a test seat and back assembly made from the fabric and a standard filling. The assembly must show no sustained flaming or progressive smouldering after the crib has burned out.

If the assembly passes, the laboratory issues a test certificate. The certificate identifies the fabric by name or reference, the filling used in the test, the standard tested against, and the test result. This certificate is the document that a designer must obtain from the fabric supplier and retain as evidence of compliance for the project.

A fabric supplier’s claim that a fabric is Crib 5 compliant without a certificate from a UKAS-accredited laboratory is not sufficient for contract specification. The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 requires the responsible person for a building to be able to demonstrate that furnishings comply with the applicable standard. A verbal assurance or a product description are not adequate evidence. The test certificate is.


What FR Treatment Cannot Do

Understanding the limits of FR treatment is as important as understanding what it achieves.

FR treatment cannot make a fabric fireproof. No textile can be made completely non-combustible by topical treatment. FR treatment reduces ignitability and slows flame spread sufficiently to meet the defined test standard. In a real fire involving sustained heat and ignition energy beyond the test conditions, treated fabric will eventually burn.

FR treatment cannot compensate for incorrect installation. A Crib 5-certified fabric used without the foam specified in the test certificate does not maintain its certification. The certificate is issued for the specific fabric and filling combination tested. Substituting a different foam invalidates the certificate for that assembly.

FR treatment does not substitute for structural fire safety. The fire resistance of the building fabric — walls, floors, doors, compartmentation — is a separate matter from the fire safety of soft furnishings. FR upholstery fabric is one element of a fire safety strategy, not a substitute for the rest of it.

FR treatment does not make a fabric immune to cleaning degradation permanently. Back-coated fabrics are durable under normal cleaning conditions, but cleaning with inappropriate chemicals — very high pH alkaline cleaners, solvents incompatible with the binder system — can over time affect the integrity of the coating. The cleaning code on the fabric data sheet should be followed.


What Happens When a Treated Fabric Is Cleaned

The question designers are most frequently asked by clients is whether the FR treatment survives cleaning. The answer depends on the treatment method and the cleaning agent.

Back-coated upholstery fabrics coded S (solvent clean only) should not be cleaned with water-based products. The binder system holding the back-coating to the fabric may be water-sensitive. Repeated water-based cleaning of an S-coded back-coated fabric can progressively weaken the adhesion of the coating. The FR compound may remain present but its mechanical adhesion to the fabric is reduced.

Back-coated fabrics coded W or WS can be spot-cleaned with water-based products without significant effect on the back-coating, provided the products are not strongly alkaline. Hotel-grade alkaline cleaners applied repeatedly can over time affect the coating. This is one of the reasons to prefer inherently fire-resistant fabrics for hotel environments with high-frequency professional cleaning. See our hotel fabric specification guide for practical guidance on this.

Wet-padded curtain fabrics treated with water-soluble inorganic salt compounds are water-sensitive by nature. The standard BS 5867 Part 2 Type B test includes a water-soak stage precisely to assess whether the treatment survives cleaning. A fabric that passes this stage has demonstrated that its treatment survives a defined level of water exposure. This does not mean the treatment is permanent under repeated laundering. For healthcare curtain applications requiring Type C certification, a more rigorous laundering pre-conditioning is included in the test.


The Treatment Supply Chain

Understanding who is responsible for what in the FR treatment supply chain helps designers avoid the most common specification failures.

The fabric supplier is responsible for knowing whether their fabric can be treated, which treatment method is appropriate, and which treatment providers have successfully treated their fabric before. A good fabric supplier maintains this information and can advise the designer before the fabric is ordered.

The treatment provider applies the FR compound and, in most cases, arranges testing through a UKAS-accredited laboratory. The treatment provider issues the test certificate. They are responsible for the quality and consistency of the treatment and for ensuring the treated fabric meets the specified standard.

The designer is responsible for specifying the correct standard for the project, confirming that the fabric supplier and treatment provider can meet it, and obtaining the test certificate before the fabric is installed. The designer cannot certify compliance — only the testing laboratory can do that — but the designer is responsible for ensuring the certified fabric is what is installed.

The contractor or upholsterer is responsible for installing the certified fabric with the certified filling. Substituting materials without re-testing invalidates the certificate. The contractor should be briefed on this before work begins.


Frequently Asked Questions

Does FR treatment change how a fabric looks or feels?

Back-coating, correctly applied to the reverse of an upholstery fabric, does not alter the appearance or handle of the face. The back will feel slightly firmer and heavier but the face pile character and surface quality are unchanged. Wet padding for curtain treatment can affect the handle of lightweight or delicate fabrics — sheers in particular may feel slightly stiffer after treatment. Any fabric where handle or appearance change would be commercially significant should be sample-treated and approved before committing to the full order.

How long does FR treatment last?

Inherent fire resistance is permanent. Topical back-coating is durable under normal contract conditions and will typically remain effective for the life of the fabric provided it is cleaned according to the cleaning code and not subjected to chemicals that attack the binder system. Wet-padded treatments are less durable and may require re-treatment after intensive cleaning or after a defined number of years in high-frequency cleaning environments. For healthcare curtains under BS 5867 Type C, re-treatment after a defined number of wash cycles is standard practice.

Can a fabric be re-treated after cleaning?

Yes, in most cases. Back-coated upholstery fabrics that have been in service for many years can typically be re-treated if the original treatment has degraded, though this requires removing the fabric from the furniture. Wet-padded curtain fabrics can be re-treated when they are laundered if the treatment has been removed. The re-treated fabric must be re-tested if a new certificate is required. Contact the original treatment provider for advice on re-treatment for specific fabrics.

What is the difference between Crib 5 and BS 7176?

BS 5852 Crib 5 is the test method — the specific ignition source and test procedure. BS 7176 is the specification standard for non-domestic upholstered seating that references Crib 5 and additionally includes the cigarette and match tests, a water-soak stage, and documentation of the specific hazard category and filling used. For hotel and contract upholstery, BS 7176 Medium Hazard is the correct standard to specify because it produces a more complete and defensible certificate than Crib 5 alone. See our Crib 5 guide and hotel fabric specification guide for full detail.

Can I self-certify that a fabric is fire retardant?

No. Only a UKAS-accredited testing laboratory can issue a valid fire test certificate. A fabric supplier, designer, treatment provider, or contractor cannot self-certify FR compliance. Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the responsible person for a commercial building must be able to produce evidence of compliance. A test certificate from a UKAS-accredited laboratory is that evidence. A verbal assurance, a product description, or a supplier’s own claim of compliance are not.


For the fire standards requiring treatment, see our Crib 5 guide. For which fibres can be treated, see our FR treatment and fibre compatibility guide. For dye types and their FR interaction, see our dye types and FR treatment guide.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

Colour in Interior Design: Naming, Systems, Translation and Metamerism

Colour in Interior Design: Naming, Communication, and Specification

The specification problem: Colour names are commercial and subjective. The same underlying colour has dozens of different names across suppliers, paint brands, and clients — and no two designers will necessarily agree on what duck egg means.
The solution: Always resolve to a colour system reference — NCS for interior surfaces, RAL for metal finishes, Pantone for print and brand work — before ordering.
The hidden risk: Metamerism. A fabric that matches in the showroom under daylight may not match under the artificial light in the finished room.
The translation table below groups common UK interior design colour names by the underlying colour they typically describe, as used in 2026.

Colour is the specification decision most likely to cause a client complaint and the one most rarely handled with precision. A client approves a fabric described as blush. The designer orders a paint described as petal. The upholsterer sources a trim described as powder pink. All three are different colours. The scheme arrives on site and nothing matches because no one resolved the name to a number.

This guide covers how colour naming works and why it fails, which colour system to use and when, how to communicate colour precisely across trades, and why the same colour looks different to different people and in different light. The translation reference below groups the most common UK interior design colour names by colour family, as of 2026.


Why Colour Names Fail

Every fabric house, paint brand, and tile supplier names its own colours. The names are chosen for commercial appeal, not precision. A paint company wants Elephant’s Breath to evoke warmth and character. A fabric house wants their Biscuit to suggest luxury neutrality. Neither name tells you where the colour sits in any colour space. Both names could plausibly describe a wide range of warm mid-toned neutrals.

The problem compounds across a project. A designer specifying a scheme involving fabric from one supplier, paint from another, carpet from a third, and joinery from a fourth is working across four independent naming systems. There is no cross-reference between them. The only way to align them is to resolve every colour to a shared external reference — a colour system number — and communicate that number to every trade.

Even within a single supplier’s range, names shift. A fabric house that has offered a colour called Midnight for ten years may reformulate the dye lot, slightly alter the weave, and produce a Midnight that is measurably different from the one specified two years earlier. The name is the same. The colour is not.

The naming problem is also cultural. British designers use colour names that reflect a particular historical and landscape vocabulary — stone, slate, chalk, flint, pewter, linen, dove. American designers use a different vocabulary. European designers working in the Nordic tradition use the NCS system. A project involving international suppliers requires an explicit colour system reference to avoid compounding the naming problem across languages as well as trades.


Colour Systems: Which to Use and When

NCS — Natural Color System. The most useful colour system for interior design specification. NCS describes colours in terms of how they are perceived by the human eye, using six elementary visual colours: white, black, red, yellow, green, and blue. An NCS code such as S 3020-Y50R specifies blackness (30%), chromaticness (20%), and hue (50% toward red from yellow). The S prefix indicates the second edition of the standard. NCS is used by architects and interior designers across Europe and is the reference standard for major paint manufacturers including Jotun and Dulux Trade in their professional ranges. When specifying wall colours for a commercial interior project, NCS is the correct system to use. It allows you to communicate a precise colour to a painter, a fabric supplier, and a joinery manufacturer without relying on any of their proprietary names.

RAL. The European standard for powder coating, metalwork, and architectural finishes. RAL Classic uses four-digit codes covering approximately 215 colours. RAL 9016 is Traffic White. RAL 7016 is Anthracite Grey. When specifying metal chair frames, radiators, window frames, or any powder-coated architectural element, RAL is the correct system. Most powder coating suppliers work from RAL as their primary reference. RAL does not map directly to NCS or Pantone without conversion, and conversions are approximate rather than exact.

Pantone. The dominant colour system in graphic design, brand communication, and print production. Pantone codes are used when specifying a brand colour for print, signage, or product. In interior design, Pantone is occasionally used as a colour reference for upholstery and wallcovering suppliers who offer Pantone matching, but it is not the primary system for architectural finishes. Pantone codes appear on printed swatches and fabric samples but should not be used as the sole colour reference for a painted surface, as the translation from ink to paint is approximate.

BS 4800. The British Standard colour specification for paints used in building work. BS 4800 covers a defined set of colours identified by a code such as BS 4800 10 A 03 (a warm off-white). It is used primarily in public sector and heritage projects where British Standard compliance is specified. Many general contractors and architects working on commercial buildings in the UK will be familiar with BS 4800 references. It is a smaller palette than NCS and less commonly used for bespoke or high-design interiors.

The practical rule is: use NCS for all wall, floor, and soft furnishing colour communication on interior design projects. Use RAL for metalwork and powder-coated elements. Obtain both references where possible so that trades working in either system can match without conversion.


Metamerism: Why the Colour That Matched in the Showroom Looks Wrong on Site

Metamerism is the phenomenon by which two surfaces that appear identical under one light source appear different under another. It is one of the most common causes of colour-match complaints on interior design projects and one of the least discussed with clients in advance.

The reason it occurs is that two surfaces can reflect the same amount of light to the eye under one type of illumination while having different underlying spectral profiles. Under a different light source, the differences in spectral profile become visible. A fabric and a paint that match perfectly under the daylight of a showroom window may look visibly different under the warm tungsten halogen downlights in the finished room. Both colours are correct. The light source changed the relationship between them.

Metamerism is particularly common between natural and synthetic materials. A mohair velvet and a painted wall that match under daylight are likely to show metameric shift under artificial light because natural fibre dyes and paint pigments have different spectral curves. It is also common between fabrics from different fibre types — a cotton and a polyester in the same colourway may match under daylight and diverge under artificial light for the same reason.

The practical response is to view all fabric samples and paint samples together under the artificial light sources specified for the finished room before approving the scheme. This means reviewing the lighting specification in advance and obtaining the same lamp type for the sample viewing. Most clients and many designers view samples in daylight or under office fluorescent lighting and assume the match will hold. It often does not.

For high-stakes colour matching — a large hotel project where hundreds of chairs must match a specified wall colour across multiple rooms — commission a formal metamerism assessment from a testing laboratory before committing to production quantities.


Colour Perception Differences Between People

Approximately 8% of men and 0.5% of women have some form of colour vision deficiency. The most common type is red-green deficiency, in which the receptor cells that distinguish red from green are absent or abnormal. A person with this condition perceives red and green as variations of the same brownish yellow. This is not a minor variation — it is a fundamental difference in how approximately one in twelve male clients perceives the fabric palette a designer is presenting.

Colour vision deficiency is frequently undiagnosed. Clients who have lived with it since birth have developed compensatory strategies and may not disclose it or may not know they have it. A designer who presents a scheme relying on contrast between red-toned and green-toned neutrals — terracotta versus sage, for example — may be presenting a scheme the client cannot see as intended.

Beyond clinical deficiency, there is significant variation in how people with normal colour vision name and categorise colours. Studies have shown that colour naming is culturally and linguistically variable — what one language group calls blue, another language group divides into two separate colour categories. Two designers with normal colour vision looking at the same fabric may describe its undertone differently, and both will be accurately reporting what they see. The human visual system is not a calibrated instrument. It is a perception system shaped by language, culture, expectation, and the colours surrounding the object being observed.

In practice, this means that verbal colour descriptions are unreliable between any two people unless they are standing in front of the same physical sample under the same light at the same time. The specification implication is the same as for naming: resolve to a colour system reference and communicate physical samples, not verbal descriptions or digital images.


Colour Translation Reference: Common Interior Design Names by Family (2026)

The following groups the most frequently used colour names in UK interior design, upholstery, and decorating as of 2026, organised by the underlying colour they typically describe. Names within each group are not identical — they occupy overlapping but distinct territory — but they are commonly used interchangeably by clients, designers, and suppliers who do not share a colour system reference. The groups are a starting point for conversation, not a claim of equivalence.

Whites and near-whites. Brilliant white, pure white, chalk white, off-white, cloudy white, old white, linen white, ivory, cream, antique white, aged white, bone, parchment white, ceramic white, architectural white. These names span a wide range from cold blue-whites through warm cream-whites. A client who asks for cream and a client who asks for ivory may be describing colours a full tone apart. Always show physical samples.

Warm greiges and neutral taupes. Greige, warm grey, stone, putty, linen, parchment, oatmeal, mushroom, taupe, mole, beige, buff, calico, string, natural, jute, raffia, hessian, wheat, biscuit, driftwood, pale stone, light stone, warm stone. This is the most densely populated territory in UK interior design naming and the one most prone to miscommunication. Greige alone is used to describe colours ranging from pale warm beige to mid warm grey. Always resolve to NCS before specifying in this family.

Cool greys. Silver, lead, slate, pewter, gunmetal, graphite, charcoal grey, payne’s grey, dove grey, ash grey, mist grey, flint, pebble, smoke, zinc, concrete grey, storm grey, elephant grey, mouse. The warm-cool axis within grey is the primary source of mismatch in this family. A warm grey specified by a designer may read as brown against the cool grey chosen by a contractor for metalwork. NCS or RAL references resolve this.

Blue-greens and aquas. Duck egg, teal, peacock, kingfisher, jade blue, lagoon, aqua, eau de nil, mineral blue, verdigris, turquoise, malachite, sea green, ocean, petrol, airforce blue (with green undertone). Duck egg and teal are used interchangeably by many clients but occupy different positions — duck egg is typically a pale, muted blue-green and teal is a deeper, more saturated blue-green. Eau de nil is greener and paler than both. These distinctions are lost without a physical sample or a colour system reference.

Blues. Navy, midnight blue, ink, indigo, denim blue, storm blue, petrol (with blue undertone), prussian blue, french navy, cobalt, ultramarine, cornflower blue, wedgwood blue, china blue, powder blue, pale blue, sky blue, dusk blue, twilight blue, deep sea. Navy alone covers a range from near-black blue-black through mid blue-navy to softer slightly lighter navies. Ink and midnight typically sit at the dark end. Wedgwood and china blue sit at the lighter, cooler end.

Greens. Sage, eucalyptus, olive, khaki, moss, fern, forest green, hunter green, racing green, bottle green, dark green, heritage green, military green, lichen, oregano, artichoke, willow, soft sage, pale sage, mint, jade, malachite, emerald, jungle, avocado, apple green, pistachio. Sage is the most widely misapplied name in UK interiors. It is used to describe everything from pale grey-green through mid green-grey to distinctly green muted mid-tones. A client who asks for sage may mean any of twenty different colours.

Pinks and blushes. Blush, dusty rose, dusky pink, rose, antique rose, petal, old rose, powder pink, nude, flesh, ballet pink, candy pink, shell pink, dawn pink, cameo, clay pink, terracotta pink, blossom, peach blush, pale copper. Blush and dusty rose are frequently used as synonyms but blush typically carries a lighter, more pink tone while dusty rose sits further toward red-pink with more grey. Peach blush crosses into the orange-pink territory that can read as terracotta under warm artificial light.

Terracottas and clays. Terracotta, rust, burnt orange, sienna, burnt sienna, copper, brick red, clay, adobe, paprika, spice, cinnamon, ginger, saffron, turmeric, ochre-red. Terracotta has shifted considerably in UK design usage over 2023 to 2026, moving from a darker burnt clay toward lighter, more muted clay pinks. A fabric specified as terracotta in 2019 and a fabric specified as terracotta in 2026 may be visibly different colours.

Ochres and mustards. Ochre, mustard, turmeric, gold, amber, honey, sand, straw, hay, maize, sunflower, chartreuse (warm end), saffron, golden yellow, aged gold, antique gold, harvest. Mustard and ochre are frequently confused. Ochre is typically a more muted, earthy yellow-brown. Mustard is warmer and more saturated. Honey sits between them. Gold crosses into metallic territory that is distinct from pigment-based versions of the same tone.

Browns and taupes. Tobacco, chocolate, mahogany, walnut, chestnut, caramel, mocha, coffee, cocoa, espresso, bark, sepia, burnt umber, raw umber. Taupe, mole, beaver, warm stone, fawn, doeskin, camel, vicuna, praline, hazel, truffle. The brown-taupe family is split between the red-brown furniture tones (walnut, mahogany) and the cooler grey-brown neutrals (mole, taupe, beaver). A client who asks for camel may mean anything from a warm tan through to a dark golden brown depending on their reference point.

Blacks and near-blacks. Jet black, pure black, soft black, charcoal, anthracite, gunmetal, ink, pitch, ebony, onyx, carbon, slate black, warm black, blue-black, off-black. Off-black and near-black have become a significant design category in UK interiors. Railings (blue-black), Downpipe (blue-grey-black), and similar deep tones occupy different positions on the warm-cool axis within apparent black and will not match each other on site.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between duck egg and teal?

Duck egg is typically a pale, muted blue-green with significant whiteness — it reads as a soft, quiet colour in most rooms. Teal is deeper and more saturated, with a stronger blue-green chromatic content. Some suppliers use the names interchangeably, which makes them unreliable without a physical sample. Eau de nil sits to the greener, paler side of duck egg. Petrol sits to the darker, bluer side of teal. Always view physical samples side by side rather than ordering from name descriptions alone.

What does greige mean?

Greige is a portmanteau of grey and beige, describing a neutral that sits between the two. It has become one of the most popular colour families in UK interior design since approximately 2018 and is heavily used in both residential and hospitality specification. The problem is that different suppliers use greige to describe colours spanning a significant range — from pale warm beige with barely perceptible grey, through to mid warm grey with beige undertones. There is no standard definition. Always request a physical sample and resolve to an NCS reference before ordering.

What colour system should interior designers use?

NCS is the most appropriate colour system for interior design specification in the UK and Europe. It describes colours in terms of visual perception, is used by major paint manufacturers in their professional ranges, and allows precise communication across trades without relying on proprietary colour names. RAL should be used for metalwork, powder coating, and architectural hardware. Pantone is appropriate for brand colour communication and print. BS 4800 applies to public sector and heritage projects with British Standard requirements. Always obtain an NCS reference for any colour that will be matched across multiple suppliers or trades.

What is metamerism and how does it affect fabric specification?

Metamerism is the phenomenon by which two surfaces that appear identical under one light source appear different under another. In interior specification, it most commonly occurs when a fabric approved in daylight in a showroom does not match the paint or other materials under the artificial lighting of the finished room. The underlying colours are correct — the light source changed the relationship between their spectral profiles. To avoid metameric mismatches, always view fabric and paint samples together under the same light source as the finished room before approving a scheme. For large-scale projects, a formal metamerism assessment can be commissioned from a testing laboratory.

What is sage green?

Sage is one of the most widely misapplied colour names in UK interior design. It is used by different suppliers and clients to describe colours ranging from pale grey-green (barely green, primarily grey) through to distinctly green mid-tones with visible chromatic content. The common territory is a muted, greyed green — a green that has been reduced by the addition of grey or its complementary colour until the green is soft rather than vivid. Eucalyptus, willow, and soft sage typically sit at the paler, more muted end. Lichen and oregano sit at the more complex, multi-toned end. Always use a physical sample and NCS reference when specifying any green in this family.

Why do colours look different to different people?

Two main reasons. First, approximately 8% of men and 0.5% of women have colour vision deficiency, most commonly red-green deficiency, in which red and green are perceived as variations of the same brownish tone. This is frequently undiagnosed. Second, even among people with normal colour vision, colour naming is variable — shaped by language, culture, and prior experience. Two designers with identical colour vision may describe the same fabric undertone differently and both are accurately reporting their perception. The implication for specification is consistent: verbal descriptions and digital images are unreliable. Physical samples under agreed lighting conditions are the only reliable basis for colour approval.


For guidance on colour fastness and how fabric colours perform over time, see our colour fastness and crocking guide and our light fastness and Blue Wool Scale guide.

Request Samples

Order cutting samples of any fabric from our current collections. Trade accounts only.

Order Cuttings

Faux Leather Upholstery

Brown Faux Leather Upholstery Banquette
Brown Faux Leather Upholstery Banquette

Faux (or fake) Leather offers a great alterantive to leather. With Martindale rubs of over 100,000 this is a very safe choice for high use contract areas. It’s usually made of a pure cotton basecloth with a poly-cotton visible coating. There are many other animal skins that are mimiced in the same way and in many cases the finishes are convincing.

But why not just use leather?

Much leather production has now moved away from the West to areas with less stringent environmental laws and lower wage rates. This is where the problem lies.

Chromium based compounds are used in the tanning and curing process of real leather. They are thought to be carcinogenic as, in some European tanning factories, cancer rates were found to be up to 50% higher in workers than in the population as a whole. Furthermore there were higher incidences of Leukemia in children living in areas near the tanneries. Environmental problems are exacerbated by the siting of factories next to rivers; the significant amounts of discharge that are produced are fed into the water courses and then dispersed over wide areas. In more lowly regulated economies it is not unreasonable to believe that the situation is probably worse.

Moving towards a better leather requires that chromium use is stopped completely and that the water used in production is cleaned and re-used in the factory. Any tanins and dyes uses would preferably be plant based.

Food for thought: If you wear leather clothing on sweaty skin then chromium residues in the leather can rub off and enter the skin.

Faux Leather on doors and walls

Brown Faux Leather Upholstery Banquette
Brown Faux Leather Upholstery Banquette

KOTHEA had two recent projects where we had to adhere Faux Leather vertically. This poses a more serious challenge than paper-based wall coverings due to both the weight of the fabric (nearly 1kg per linear metre) and the wear and tear when adhered to a door. Both installations were more involved than domestic ones as we had to consider firstly the use on a yacht in a marine environment and secondly the high levels of usage of a hotel.

So the adhesive needs to be strong.

A further set of issues to overcome are related to how the fabric might react to any chemicals in the adhesive. In both instances our fabric had a 100% cotton back coat with a vinyl mix visible layer. Superfically a conclusion could be drawn that most adhesives would be OK with the surfaces they are fastening to in these instances ie a natural wooden door and inert stone wall combined with the natural cotton back cloth. However the adhesive will almost certainly penetrate the back cloth. Becuase of this the use of a solvent based adhesive, such as Asceton, is most definately not recommended.

So the adhesive needs to be strong and water based.

After performing suitability tests in these instances we chose to use Mapei’s Adheselix VS45 . VS45 is an acrylic adhesive in water dispersion and has been used extensively by Mapei’s customers for PVC/foam wallcoverings and rubber flooring. An alternative of Adesilex G19 was also suggested for areas with more moisture but that was not necessary in these cases.

A Great Interior Designer’s Profile Would …

What Makes A Great Interior Designer Profile?

I would argue that an image is the basis of a great profile for an interior designer.

Something to WOW me and to attract me all within a second. Something that tells me more about you than perhaps words could do succinctly.

Then you’ve hooked me I might read on a bit further.

Then you would need to tell your client what kind of projects and people you work with and perhaps also how you engage and work. You might NOT even need a killer headline “Best Interior Designer In London” or you might.

What do you think?

But of course you already have done such a profile on your web site 😉

We are happy to host (no strings or ropes attached) a brief profile of your INTERIOR DESIGN or ARCHITECTURE business on this blog (https://www.kothea.com) with a link back to your site. Nada. Nothing Rien. No cost. Your benefit is free advertising to subscribers to and readers of this blog and a reputable backlink to boost your site’s visibility even further.

What do we get out of it? One day you’ll buy some fabrics or cashmere throws from us. Maybe. Perhaps. Hopefully 🙂

To be clear: This is for interior designers and architects and NOT their suppliers.